Lead, follow, or get AI'd . . . Consider, for a moment, an old and unglamorous fact about our species. Long before we built parliaments, wrote constitutions, or even carved the first law into stone, we were primates arranging ourselves into troops. And every troop, from the baboons on the savanna to the earliest human bands crouched around a fire, discovered the same problem: someone had to decide when to move, when to fight, when to share the kill, and when to hoard it. Leadership never was an invention of civilization. It is older than civilization, older than language itself, written into the nervous systems of social animals a hundred million years before anyone thought to ask whether power corrupts. And yet we go on being surprised by it. Every human hierarchy, given enough time, seems to drift toward the same failure. Power collects at the top, and the top grows heavy. The people making decisions become, by slow and almost imperceptible degrees, insulated from the people livi...
The oldest pattern in human history — conquest, comfort, collapse — may be running its course again, this time in Washington There is an old proverb, worn smooth by centuries of use in a dozen languages, that too many cooks spoil the broth. A companion saying, less quotable but truer, holds that there is never enough agreement to decide, but always enough to delay. And beneath both sits a harder observation, one that historians have been rediscovering in every collapsed empire from Rome to the Qing: when everyone is responsible, no one is responsible. Committees do not lose wars or empires. They simply fail to notice, in any timely manner, that they are losing them. This is not an argument against democracy so much as an argument about democracy's purpose. Shared rule buys legitimacy, flexibility, and the capacity to correct course without bloodshed — real advantages, and rare ones in the historical record. But it has always carried a cost: diffuse respons...